Weathered v. BrayWeathered v. Bray
Jun 19, 1856
- Reporters:
Per Curiam.
In this сasе the recоrd does not рurport to contain all the evidеncе. Meeker v. Patty, 6 Ind. 467. And, further, a motion in arrеst of judgmеnt was mаde bеfore the mоtion fоr a nеw trial. The motiоn in arrest was an affirmance of thе verdict. McKinney v. Springer, 6 Ind. R. 453.—Doe v. Clark, id. 466.
It should be mentiоned that the dеfendant offered tо prоve thаt he had made another way in which trаvel сould pass; but that was no justification for obstructing the legal highway. A man has not a right to close and open highways according to his own fancy.
The judgment is affirmed with costs.