History
  • No items yet
midpage
Weart v. Cruser
49 N.J.L. 475
N.J.
1887
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgmént in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.

*481For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Dixon, Knapp, Parker, Reed, Scudder, Yan Syckel, Brown, Clement, Cole, McGregor'. 13. For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Weart v. Cruser
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Mar 15, 1887
Citation: 49 N.J.L. 475
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.