1 Wash. 415 | Wash. | 1890
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The facts in this case are similar in all respects to those of the case of Foster v. Territory, ante, p. 411, just decided by this court, except that in this action the court ordered the destruction by the sheriff, of certain gambling apparatus which was seized in the possession of the defendant and held as evidence upon the trial. Appellant claims that the statute permits the destruction of such gambling implements only as have been seized under the authority of a search warrant and retained as evidence, and that the property destroyed was not so obtained. It is difficult to see how the method of obtaining the possession of things liable to destruction on ac
For the foregoing reasons, and those given in the case of Foster v. Territory, above mentioned, the judgment of the court below must be sustained.