History
  • No items yet
midpage
Way v. Cutting
17 N.H. 450
Superior Court of New Hampshir...
1845
Check Treatment
Parker, C. J.

We are of opinion that this action cannot be maintained. The contract was entire, and has never been rescinded.

This case cannot be distinguished from that of Miner v. Bradley, 22 Pick. 457, unless it be in the fact that the contract there related to personal property, and the vendee could maintain an action upon it for the breach. It may be that here the plaintiff cannot maintain an action on the contract, there being no writing between the parties.

If the result would be that the plaintiff was without remedy otherwise, we should be inclined to consider this case an exception to the general rule, for that reason, and to hold that the plaintiff could recover a proportionate part of the purchase money. 17 Maine 296, Richards v. Allen. But as there has been a part performance by the defendant, the plaintiff may have relief in equity, if the defendant has failed to convey all that he contracted to convey and was paid for. Plaintiff nonsuit.

Case Details

Case Name: Way v. Cutting
Court Name: Superior Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 15, 1845
Citation: 17 N.H. 450
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.