Stayton, Associate Justice.
The transcript in this case contains neither the pleadings of the parties, statement of facts nor bills of exception, but consists solely of the judgment and pro*106ceedings had subsequent to its rendition.- From such a transcript we can not know what was the issue between the parties, nor the facts on which the judgment was rendered. It is the duty of a person who seeks the revision of a judgment to bring before this court, in accordance with the provisions of articles 1413, 1414, Revised Statutes, a transcript, or otherwise such a transcript as contains a full and correct copy of all the proceedings had in the cause. " (Hubby v. Harris, 59 Tex., 14" court="Tex." date_filed="1883-02-20" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/hubby-v-harris-4893998?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="4893998">59 Texas, 14.)
From the transcript before us, the judgment of the district court can not be revised, and the writ of error will be dismissed.
Dismissed.
Opinion delivered October 14, 1887.