midpage

Watson v. VestWatson v. Vest

Alabama Court of Appeals
Oct 26, 1926
8 Div. 492.
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Samford
SAMFORD, J.

The appellant has failed to comply with Supreme Court rules 10 ‍‌‌​‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‍and 12 relating to the filing of briefs on appeal.

The rules applicable to the filing of briefs on appeal are simple and easy to ‍‌‌​‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‍understand and to comply with, and they were designed to aid the courts and to facilitate disposition of cases. Where the requirements of ‍‌‌​‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‍rules 10 and 12 are ignored by appellants, this court will not consider the questions noted in the assignments of error. This court ‍‌‌​‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‍is in entire accord with the opinion in Ogburn-Griffin Gro. Co. v. Orient Ins. Co., 188 Ala. 218-223, 66 So. 434. Upon- authority of that case ‍‌‌​‌​​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‍and others of similar import, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Watson v. Vest
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 26, 1926
Citations: 110 So. 58; 21 Ala. App. 561; 1926 Ala. App. LEXIS 304; 8 Div. 492.
Docket Number: 8 Div. 492.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
Log In