Watson v. State, 439 So. 2d 271

PER CURIAM.

We reverse appellant’s conviction of burglary because it appears without contradiction that appellant was invited to enter and remain in the structure in question by the complaining witness. See Section 810.02(1), Florida Statutes (1979) and State v. Hicks, 421 So.2d 510 (Fla.1982). The remaining judgments and sentences’ are affirmed.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Watson v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Sep 21, 1983

Citations: 439 So. 2d 271; 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24575; No. 82-1510

Docket Number: No. 82-1510

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.