History
  • No items yet
midpage
Watson v. State
123 P. 189
Okla. Crim. App.
1912
Check Treatment

Appellant attempted to appeal by filing what purports to be a transcript of the record in this court. This transcript is not certified to by the clerk of the court, as the law requires. SeeMakatch v. State, 5 Okla. Cr. 34, 113 P. 200; Perkey v. State,4 Okla. Cr. 239, 111 P. 663. *Page 249

Where an appeal is attempted to be taken by transcript of the record, the clerk of the court must certify, under the seal of the court, that such transcript contains a true and correct statement of the record in said cause. See Abel v. Blair,3 Okla. 402, 41 P. 342. The clerk is the custodian of the record, and he must certify to the truthfulness of the statements contained in such transcript, as the same appears on file and of record in his office. See Wade et al. v. Mitchell, 14 Okla. 170,79 P. 95. There is no such certificate in this record; and the appeal must therefore be dismissed.

ARMSTRONG and DOYLE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Watson v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Date Published: Apr 25, 1912
Citation: 123 P. 189
Docket Number: No. A-1184.
Court Abbreviation: Okla. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.