Watson v. StateWatson v. State
Versions:647 So. 2d 2451994 WL 637681
In this Anders appeal, we find merit only in appellant‘s argument that the imposition of $2.00 in costs was improper because appellant was not given notice and an opportunity to be heard. We agree and order those $2.00 costs stricken. See Williams v. State, 601 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We otherwise affirm.
FRANK, C.J., and CAMPBELL and BLUE, JJ., concur.