History
  • No items yet
midpage
Watson v. Neal
35 S.C. 595
S.C.
1891
Check Treatment

This was a motion to require appellant to amend his Brief by printing therein the order of the Circuit Judge settling the case. It was not denied that the printed Brief contained the case as settled; and the Circuit Judge did not direct his order of settlement to be printed.

*596December 23, 1891. Gr. F. Prince, for motion. B. F. Whitner, contra.

The court held that it had no power to amend the case as settled by the Circuit Judge. A “Case” may be recommitted to have it resettled or amended by the Circuit Judge ; but that is not the motion here. Besides, this order is not one of the papers required by rule 5 to be incorporated in the “Case.” Motion refused.

Case Details

Case Name: Watson v. Neal
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Dec 23, 1891
Citation: 35 S.C. 595
Docket Number: No. 2816
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.