Watson v. Magill
85 N.J. Eq. 592
N.J.
1916
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion hied in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance—Swayzb, Trenchakd, Bergen, Kalisch^ Black, White, Teehune, Williams—8. For reversal—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Garrison, Parker, Min-turn, Vredenburgi-i, Heppenheimer, Taylor—7.