Watson v. Magill

85 N.J. Eq. 592 | N.J. | 1916

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion hied in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance—Swayzb, Trenchakd, Bergen, Kalisch^ Black, White, Teehune, Williams—8. For reversal—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Garrison, Parker, Min-turn, Vredenburgi-i, Heppenheimer, Taylor—7.