Watson v. Ellis
279 P. 325 | Okla. | 1929
The identical question here involved was decided adversely to the contention of plaintiff in error herein in No. 17993, Anna Eva Jacobs, nee Carney, v. Sallie E. Ambrister et al., in an opinion by this court filed on the 17th day of April, 1928,
It therefore follows that the judgment appealed from herein must be and the same is hereby affirmed.
LESTER, V. C. J., and CLARK, CULLISON, SWINDALL, and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.
RILEY, J., dissents.
HEFNER, J., not participating.
MASON, C. J., absent.
