midpage

Watson v. CrandallWatson v. Crandall

Supreme Court of Missouri
Oct 15, 1883
Reporters:
Before:
Ray
Ray, J.

This cause was commenced in the St. Louis circuit court, where there was a dismissal ‍​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‍as to defendant Minshall, and a judgment for the plaintiff against the other defendants, from which Conlogue and. McKeen appealed to the St. Louis court of appeals, where the judgment of the ‍​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‍circuit court was affirmed, from which the said Conlogue and McKeen have appealed to this court. The case is reported in 7 Mo. App. 233, where the opinion of that court is ‍​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‍set out in full, and to which reference is here had. TTpon a careful consideration and review of that opinion we are satisfied with the result reached by that, court, and ‍​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‍for the reasons assigned. After a careful examination,-also, of the elaborate briefs of counsel, in this court, we find no cause to change our views. We think the case well considered and ‍​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‍properly decided.

For these reasons the judgment of the St. Louis court of appeals is affirmed.

All concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Watson v. Crandall
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: Oct 15, 1883
Citation: 78 Mo. 583
Court Abbreviation: Mo.
Log In