History
  • No items yet
midpage
Watkins v. Robinson
451 A.2d 266
Pa. Super. Ct.
1982
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM:

The procedural posture of this appeal is essentially identical to that of Johnson v. Keystone Insurance Company, 299 Pa.Super.Ct. 187, 445 A.2d 517 (1982). Accordingly, we shall vacate the order dismissing appellant’s complaint for noncompliance with the “240 Day Rule” and Philadelphia Rule of Civil Procedure 151, and remand the case to the court below for further proceedings consistent with the opinion in Johnson v. Keystone Insurance Company, supra.

Order vacated, and case remanded for further proceedings. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Case Details

Case Name: Watkins v. Robinson
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 8, 1982
Citation: 451 A.2d 266
Docket Number: Appeal No. 188
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In