History
  • No items yet
midpage
Watkins v. Haight
18 Johns. 138
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1820
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The case of Dash v. Van Kleeck, shows that it would be unjust and against the sound principles of legislation, to consider the act as retrospective. It must be deemed prospective merely; and the motion, therefore, is denied.

Motion denied*

Case Details

Case Name: Watkins v. Haight
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1820
Citation: 18 Johns. 138
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.