Waters v. State, 650 So. 2d 232

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence imposed following revocation of Appellant’s probation. Eanes v. State, 648 So.2d 174 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (on motion for certification); Bragg v. State, 644 So.2d 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We certify the following as a question of great public importance:

MUST A TRIAL COURT, UPON REVOCATION OF PROBATION FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF COMMUNITY CONTROL, CREDIT TIME PREVIOUSLY SERVED ON PROBATION AND COMMUNITY CONTROL TO ANY NEWLY IMPOSED TERM OF IMPRISONMENT AND PROBATION FOR THE SAME OFFENSE, SO THAT THE TOTAL PERIOD OF COMMUNITY CONTROL, PROBATION, AND IMPRISONMENT ALREADY SERVED AND TO BE SERVED DOES NOT EXCEED THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM FOR A SINGLE OFFENSE?

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, MINER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Waters v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Feb 24, 1995

Citations: 650 So. 2d 232; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1833; 1995 WL 73576; No. 94-104

Docket Number: No. 94-104

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.