History
  • No items yet
midpage
Waters v. State
110 Ga. 252
Ga.
1899
Check Treatment
Simmons, C. J.

The charge being that the accused pursued on the Lord’s day the work of his ordinary calling, the same not being a work of necessity or charity, and the evidence demanding a verdict of guilty, there was no error in denying a new trial, even if a portion of the instructions to the jury were erroneous.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Case Details

Case Name: Waters v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 26, 1899
Citation: 110 Ga. 252
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In