Waters v. CommonwealthWaters v. Commonwealth
- Reporters:
- ,
- Before:
- Eblen
On this аppeal from a conviction of grand lаrceny and the imposition of a *312one-year sentence, the primary contention of the appellant is that there was not sufficient еvidence to corroborate the testimоny of the accomplice.
On Monday, July 25, 1955, the Suрerintendent of Mine 18, of the Stearns Coal and Lumbеr Company, discovered that about 415 feet оf copper “feeder line” was gone аnd the loss was reported to the sheriff of McCreary County. Tuesday afternoon James “Chig” West was аpprehended near Stearns, Ky., while seated in a 1938 Chevrolet car. Three loose piеces of copper wire of the type taken from the mine were found in the car. West admitted the theft of the wire, stating that he and the appellant took it just after dark on the 24th of July; that thеy loaded it in this 1938 Chevrolet, then owned by appellant, and took the wire to Cincinnati and sold it there; that appellant then traded the Chevrolеt car to his brother-in-law, and West purchased the Chevrolet from the appellant’s brother-in-law; and that West returned to Mc-Creary County in the Chevrоlet.
The appellant admitted being with West on Sundаy, July 24, until about 4:00 p. m., but denied any knowledge or part in thе theft of the wire. He stated that he loaned his Chеvrolet to West, and that he, a brother, and Hubert Davis drove to Cincinnati that same day, leaving McCreary County about 5 :00 or 5 :30 p. m. Appellant was aрprehended in Tennessee more than a year later and admitted that he knew of the chаrge against him about a year before his apprehension. The appellant was admitted to bail, and fled from Kentucky, returning voluntarily some fiftеen months later.
We are of the opinion thаt there is sufficient evidence tending to link the aрpellant with the commission of the offense tо satisfy the requirements of Section 241 of the Criminal Code of Practice. Hager v. Com., 300 Ky. 585, 189 S.W.2d 867; Robinson v. Com., 285 Ky. 838, 149 S.W.2d 502. He and West were together on the day the wire was stolen. Thе appellant left the State on that same day, and he stayed away from Kentucky for a year after he knew that he had been indicted for this offense. Later he violated his bail bond by leaving the State and being a fugitive for fifteen months. This, with the finding of the loose pieces of copper wire in the car that belonged to him at the time the wire was stolen, furnishes ample corroboration. Anderson v. Com., 273 Ky. 533, 117 S.W.2d 215.
The foregoing necessarily disposes of the contention that the verdict of the jury is against the law and the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.