Waterman v. Weinstein Memorial ChapelWaterman v. Weinstein Memorial Chapel
The plaintiff commenced the instant action, inter alia, to re
With respect to the cause of action alleging fraud, in opposition to the defendants’ establishment, prima facie, of their entitlement to summary judgment, the plaintiff failed to make a sufficient evidentiary showing to raise a triable issue as to whether the defendants made misrepresentations (see Del Vecchio v Nassau County, 118 AD2d 615, 618 [1986]; Brown v Lockwood, 76 AD2d 721, 730-731 [1980]).
The plaintiff contends that certain statutes and regulations governing the funeral home industry give rise to a private right of action. This argument is raised for the first time on appeal and is not properly before this Court (see Pile v Grant, 41 AD3d 810, 811 [2007]).
The plaintiff‘s remaining contentions are without merit.
Rivera, J.P., Skelos, Santucci and Leventhal, JJ., concur.