History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wason v. Burnham
44 A. 693
| N.H. | 1896
|
Check Treatment

After his appointment as executor of the will of William Perkins, the defendant called upon the plaintiff; and requested a settlement and an examination of his accounts. The defendant excepted to the admission of evidence as to the conversation between the parties at that time. The conversation was between the plaintiff and defendant who are parties of record, it was a part of the res gestae, and the defendant was discharging his duties as executor of Perkins' will in endeavoring to erect a settlement of the plaintiff's account. Under these circumstances, the defendant's admission of the *Page 554 justice of the plaintiff's claim might properly be shown in evidence. Tenney v. Evans, 14 N.H. 343. The exception to the question and answer excluded by the court is groundless. The verdict should not be set aside because of an inadvertent answer of a witness, which the court found did not affect the result of the trial.

Exceptions overruled.

WALLACE, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Wason v. Burnham
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1896
Citation: 44 A. 693
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.