Washington v. StateWashington v. State
Freddrick Washington challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to correct sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) in which the court found his assertion that this mandatory three-year minimum for possession of a firearm
Attempts to correct sentences which claim, as does Washington’s, an absence of a factual basis to sustain the mandatory portion of the sentence are in fact cognizable through the use of rule 3.800(a). Hubbard v. State,
We reverse the order of the trial court and remand for attachments which refute the claim, or, if none is available, for an eviden-tiary hearing. Hubbard,
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Notes
. Appellant claims there was no evidence that he was ever in manual possession of a firearm during the commission of the robbery to which he entered a plea, and that as a consequence no mandatory prison time applies. § 775.087(2), Fla.Stat. (1987).
. Depositions or police affidavits have been deemed sufficient to support a factual basis otherwise stipulated to by Ae parties in an attack on a Aree-year minimum which attempts to vacate Ae plea based upon a lack of voluntariness in entering Ae plea. Blackwood v. State,