History
  • No items yet
midpage
Washington v. State
631 So. 2d 367
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1994
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions but reverse those portions of appellant’s sentencing orders adjudicating him to be an habitual offender. See Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486 (Fla.1993) (in addition to receiving prior written notice of the state’s intent to habitualize, defendant must be made personally aware of both the possibility and reasonable consequences of habitualization).

DELL, C.J., and ANSTEAD and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Washington v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 9, 1994
Citation: 631 So. 2d 367
Docket Number: No. 93-1020
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.