Washington v. State
631 So. 2d 367 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1994
We affirm appellant’s convictions but reverse those portions of appellant’s sentencing orders adjudicating him to be an habitual offender. See Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486 (Fla.1993) (in addition to receiving prior written notice of the state’s intent to habitualize, defendant must be made personally aware of both the possibility and reasonable consequences of habitualization).
