Washington v. State, 631 So. 2d 367

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions but reverse those portions of appellant’s sentencing orders adjudicating him to be an habitual offender. See Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486 (Fla.1993) (in addition to receiving prior written notice of the state’s intent to habitualize, defendant must be made personally aware of both the possibility and reasonable consequences of habitualization).

DELL, C.J., and ANSTEAD and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Washington v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Feb 9, 1994

Citations: 631 So. 2d 367; 1994 WL 34005; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 779; No. 93-1020

Docket Number: No. 93-1020

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.