History
  • No items yet
midpage
435 P.3d 366
Wyo.
2019
BY THE COURT:*

/s/

MICHAEL K. DAVIS

Chief Justice

Notes

Justices Fox and Boomgaarden would have denied appellate counsel's motion to withdraw and ordered counsel to file a brief addressing the merits of this appeal. Specifically, appellate counsel should have considered whether Appellant, at arraignment, was properly advised regarding the number of counts charged and the potential penalties. See Stalcup v. State , 2013 WY 114, ¶¶ 38-39, 311 P.3d 104, 114-15 (Wyo. 2013) ; Rodriguez v. State , 917 P.2d 172, 175 (Wyo. 1996).

Case Details

Case Name: Washington v. State
Court Name: Wyoming Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 27, 2019
Citations: 435 P.3d 366; 2019 WY 22; S-18-0213
Docket Number: S-18-0213
Court Abbreviation: Wyo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In