History
  • No items yet
midpage
118 A.D.3d 603
N.Y. App. Div.
2014

EBONY D. WASHINGTON, Respondent, v MEHDI JANATI, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

March 5, 2013

104 AD3d 603 | 987 NYS2d 842

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lori S. Sattler, J.), entered March 5, 2013, which denied defendant‘s motion to vacate the judgment of annulment entered upon his default and replace it with a judgment of divorce, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his default (see CPLR 5015 [a]; Benson Park Assoc., LLC v Herman, 73 AD3d 464, 465 [1st Dept 2010]). His bare contentions that he did not understand the consequences of the fraud ground in Domestic Relations Law § 140 (e) and that he could not afford an attorney do not constitute reasonable excuses for his failure to appear in the action.

In the absence of a reasonable excuse, we need not consider whether defendant demonstrated a meritorious defense to the annulment action (M.R. v 2526 Valentine LLC, 58 AD3d 530, 532 [1st Dept 2009]).

In any event, however, we note that defendant does not dispute that he consented to the annulment. Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Saxe and Kapnick, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Washington v. Janati
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 24, 2014
Citations: 118 A.D.3d 603; 987 N.Y.S.2d 842
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In