History
  • No items yet
midpage
Washington v. Gulf Refining Co.
257 Pa. 157
Pa.
1917
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

We have not been convinced that the learned 'trial judge erred in refusing to take this case from the jury. Under the testimony it was for them to pass upon the negligence of the defendant and the contributory negligence of the plaintiff, and, as nothing in the third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh assignments of error calls for a retrial, the judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Washington v. Gulf Refining Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Mar 12, 1917
Citation: 257 Pa. 157
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 214
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.