Washington Avenue Food Center, Inc. v. ModlinWashington Avenue Food Center, Inc. v. Modlin
Lead Opinion
By petition for a writ of certiorari, we have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, in Washington Avenue Food Center, Inc. v. Modlin et al., Fla.App.,
The factual background is adequately delineated in the opinion of the District Court under review. We find that the jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. In our opinion in Mai Kai, Inc. et al. v. Colucci et al.,
It is so ordered.
Concurrence Opinion
(concurring specially) :
I concur in the judgment for the reasons stated in Hall v. Holland, Fla.,
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting):
I would follow without modification the opinion of .the District Court with respect to the question of the liability of Washington Avenue Food Center, Inc., a Florida corporation. I think the District Court’s opinion appropriately sets forth policy considerations supported by legal precedents which are best attuned to provide a remedy for members of the public who suffer injury in cases of this kind. I refer to the text of its opinion from which headnotes 1 to 6, inclusive, are drawn.
Dissenting Opinion
(Retired) (dissenting) :
I respectfully dissent in this case, also, upon grounds stated in dissenting opinion in Mai Kai and Reilly v. Colucci,