History
  • No items yet
midpage
Warren v. Monnish
23 S.E. 823
Ga.
1896
Check Treatment
Lumpkin, J.

1. There was not, upon the hearing of an application for an injunction, any abuse of discretion in refusing to admit in evidence an affidavit which was not “intituled in the cause,” and as to which there was no proof that it was made or intended to be used as evidence in any court or in any case, save a memorandum on the back containing the names of the parties and of the court in which the application for injunction was pending, and there being nothing to show when or by whom this memorandum was entered, 'or that it was made with the affiant’s knowledge.

2. The evidence being conflicting, and apparently preponderating in favor of the defendant, there was no abuse of discretion in denying the injunction. Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Warren v. Monnish
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jan 20, 1896
Citation: 23 S.E. 823
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.