137 So. 418 | Ala. | 1931
It has been repeatedly ruled by this court that trial courts cannot be put in error for refusing special written instructions requested by the parties, in respect to the degree of conviction in the minds of the jury essential to establish an issue of fact, that are not expressed in the exact and appropriate language of the law, which is that they must be reasonably satisfied from the evidence.
Charge 10-a is faulty in this respect, and was refused without error. Birmingham Belt R. Co. v. Nelson,
The assignment predicated on the refusal of said charge is the only one argued and insisted upon, and the others must be treated as waived. Wright-Nave Contracting *525
Co. v. Alabama Fuel Iron Co.,
Affirmed.
ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.