History
  • No items yet
midpage
Waring v. Yates
10 Johns. 119
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1813
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The second objection is fatal. The declaration is bad on general demurrer.* It was so decided in Cheetham v. Lewis. (3 Johns. Rep. 42.) There should have been a special memorandum in this case, entitling the declaration of the day on which it was filed, and subsequent to the time when the cause of action accrued. The defendant is entitled to judgment, but he has leave to withdraw the demurrer, and the plaintiff may amend on payment of costs.

Judgment for the defendant

1 Tida's Pr. 767. Chitty's Pl. 259. 263, 264, 265.

Case Details

Case Name: Waring v. Yates
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 15, 1813
Citation: 10 Johns. 119
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.