History
  • No items yet
midpage
WARING v. ARAMARK MANAGEMENT, LLC
2:19-cv-05472
E.D. Pa.
Mar 24, 2020
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LEIGH WARING :

: CIVIL ACTION

v. :

: NO. 19-5472 ARAMARK MANAGEMENT, LLC :

: : ORDER AND NOW , this 24 th day of March 2020, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Partially Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 7) and Plaintiff’s response thereto (ECF No. 10), it is ordered, consistent with the accompanying opinion, that the Motion is granted in part and denied in part, as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s retaliation claims in Counts One and Two of the Amended Complaint

are dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint within 14 days of the date of this Order.

2. In all other respects, the Motion is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT: /s/ R. Barclay Surrick R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.

Case Details

Case Name: WARING v. ARAMARK MANAGEMENT, LLC
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Date Published: Mar 24, 2020
Docket Number: 2:19-cv-05472
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.