History
  • No items yet
midpage
Warder v. Blair
4 Pennyp. 182
Pa.
1884
Check Treatment
Per Curiam :

The plaintiffs were not only the vendors, but they were the manufacturers of the machine sold to the defendant. Where a manufacturer of a reaper sells one to a farmer, we think it is sold and bought with the understanding that it will do the kind of work for which it was made. Here, however, there was evidence of an agreement on the part of the’vendor that it would do as good work as another machine named. The jury have found that it was not as good, and did not do good work. The assignments are not sustained.

Judgment affirmed

Case Details

Case Name: Warder v. Blair
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Feb 6, 1884
Citation: 4 Pennyp. 182
Docket Number: No. 57
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.