Appellant Mary Swindler Ward appeals from an order denying recovery of accrued child support on the basis of collateral estoppel. We reverse.
The parties were divorced in 1980. Respondent was ordered to pay child support; however, he was consistently delinquent in his payments. Appellant remarried, and her new husband sought to adopt the child. Appellant consented
After the adoption was finalized, appellant commenced this action seeking delinquent child support which had accrued prior to the adoption. The trial judge found collateral estoppel barred the action.
This Court has held collateral estoppel may bar the litigation of issues in Family Court. See Eichman v. Eichman, 329 S. E. (2d) 764 (D.S.C. 1985); See also Cannon v. Cannon, 278 S. C. 346, 295 S. E. (2d) 875 (1982). However, the doctrine of collateral estoppel does not apply to the facts of this case.
Although appellant consented to the adoption, she was not a party to that action. She could not have raised the issue of delinquent child support since she was not a named party.
The order of the trial judge is, accordingly,
Reversed and Remanded.