Wanger v. Hipple

10 Sadler 25 | Pa. | 1888

Pee Cueiam:

It is hard to understand why the defendant should complain of the rulings of the court below. They are as favorable to him as he had any right to expect, and in some of them complaint might well come from the other side. Hippie’s right of way was established beyond controversy, and the attempt to break down that right by proof of user under a license was a total failure; and so the court might have instructed the jury.

Judgment affirmed.