Case Information
*1 Case 2:23-cv-01097-JAD-BNW Document 23 Filed 01/25/24 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA Meizhen Wang, Case No.: 2:23-cv-01097-JAD-BNW Plaintiff
Order Adopting Report and v. Recommendation Regarding Motion to
Amend Complaint Costco Wholesale Corporation; Doe
Equipment Operator, et al., [ECF Nos. 16, 20]
Defendants
The magistrate judge has considered the plaintiff’s motion to file an amended complaint [1] and recommends that the motion be granted in part and denied in part: Plaintiff may amend the complaint to (1) clarify the type of equipment that caused the accident, and/or (2) add that she is pursuing a respondeat superior theory of liability, and/or (3) remove the Doe Equipment Operator, but she may not substitute in Leonardo Lopez as a party. [2] The deadline for any party to object to that recommendation was yesterday, and no party filed anything or asked to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.” [3] Having reviewed the report and recommendation, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do.
*2 Case 2:23-cv-01097-JAD-BNW Document 23 Filed 01/25/24 Page 2 of 2 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [ECF No. 20] is ADOPTED in its entirety. The motion to amend [ECF No. 16] is granted in part and denied in part as set forth in that recommendation.
_________________________________ U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey January 25, 2024 2
[1] ECF No. 16.
[2] ECF No. 20. 22
[3] Schmidt v. Johnstone , 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 23 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia , 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).