History
  • No items yet
midpage
Walters v. Pinxton
5 Ind. 429
Ind.
1854
Check Treatment
Stuart, J.

Debt on a replevin bond. Trial by the Court. Finding and judgment for the plaintiffs. There was a motion for a new trial overruled. Certain evidence of the plaintiffs, and also of the defendants, is set out in a bill of exceptions, and it is also disclosed in the same manner that other evidence was offered and excluded. But it nowhere appears that the record contains all the evidence. The case falls within the rule in Montgomery v. Doe d. Pearson, 4 Ind. R. 266.

I. Hartman and J. Bush, for the plaintiffs. N. O. Ross, for the defendants.

Per Curiam. — The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Walters v. Pinxton
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 4, 1854
Citation: 5 Ind. 429
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.