History
  • No items yet
midpage
Walter v. Introcaso
52 A.2d 676
N.J.
1947
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Ackerson.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Colie, Waohenfeld, Eastwood, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 14.

For reversal — Hehbr, J. 1.

Case Details

Case Name: Walter v. Introcaso
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 24, 1947
Citation: 52 A.2d 676
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In