History
  • No items yet
midpage
Walter v. Fees
155 Pa. 55
Pa.
1893
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

This was an appeal from the refusal of the court below to open a judgment. In all such cases a wide discretion must necessarily be exercised by the learned judge of the court below. See Jenkintown National Bank’s Appeal, 124 Pa. 337. We find no abuse of this discretion in the present case.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Walter v. Fees
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 16, 1893
Citation: 155 Pa. 55
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 237
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.