History
  • No items yet
midpage
Walshaw v. Irwin
161 F.2d 184
3rd Cir.
1947
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Consideration of the briefs, the oral argument of the parties and the appendix convinces us that the court below did not commit any substantial error in refusing to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant and in refusing to grant a new trial to the plaintiff.

The judgment of the District Court, is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Walshaw v. Irwin
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Date Published: May 5, 1947
Citation: 161 F.2d 184
Docket Number: Nos. 9205, 9220
Court Abbreviation: 3rd Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.