History
  • No items yet
midpage
Walsh v. State
689 A.2d 131
N.J.
1997
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge ‍‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌‍Skillman’s dissenting opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 290 N.J.Super. 13, 674 A.2d 988 (1996).

For reversal — -Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, ‍‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌‍O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.

Case Details

Case Name: Walsh v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Mar 5, 1997
Citation: 689 A.2d 131
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In