Walsh v. Aspen Square Management, Inc.Walsh v. Aspen Square Management, Inc.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted and the amended complaint and cross claims against defendant Clover Management, Inc. are dismissed.
Clover met its initial burden by establishing that it was not the property manager at the time of the incident, and plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact in opposition (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Plaintiff‘s conclusory contention that additional discovery is necessary is insufficient to defeat Clover‘s motion inasmuch as plaintiff failed to make the requisite evidentiary showing “that facts essential to justify opposition may exist but cannot then be stated” (