History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wallingford v. Wood
41 Okla. 572
Okla.
1914
Check Treatment

This appeal was filed in this court January 2, 1912. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi).Streeter v. McCoy, *Page 573 34 Okla. 490, 126 P. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521,125 P. 1133; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 P. 216;Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 P. 260; M.,O. G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 127 P. 386; FirstNat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 P. 260; Snow v. Frye,34 Okla. 826, 127 P. 422.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Case Details

Case Name: Wallingford v. Wood
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Feb 28, 1914
Citation: 41 Okla. 572
Docket Number: 3474
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.