History
  • No items yet
midpage
Walling v. State
90 Tex. Crim. 463
Tex. Crim. App.
1921
Check Treatment

Appeal is from a misdemeanor conviction for embezzlement. The punishment assessed was by fine of $100 and ten days confinement in the county jail.

Our Assistant Attorney General suggests that the appeal should be dismissed because no final judgment is shown in the record. The verdict of the jury appears, but if judgment was ever entered thereon the record fails to show it. See Article 853, Vernon's C.C.P.; Mirelles v. State, 13 Texas Crim. App., 346; Pennington v. State, 11 Texas Crim. App., 281; Foster v. State,64 Tex. Crim. 531; McCuin v. State, 86 Tex.Crim. Rep., 217 S.W. Rep., 1038.

The appeal is therefore ordered dismissed.

Dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Walling v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Dec 21, 1921
Citation: 90 Tex. Crim. 463
Docket Number: No. 6431.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.