History
  • No items yet
midpage
Waller v. Taylor
42 Ala. 297
Ala.
1868
Check Treatment
JUDGE, J.

The opinion of the chancellor shows conclusively that the bill in this case is multifarious ; and for this reason it was rightfully dismissed. — Tasker v. Small, 3 Mylne & Craig, 63 ; Mole v. Smith, Jac. 490 ; Robertown v. G. W. Railway Co., 10 Simons, 314; Wood v. White, 4 Mylne & Craig, 460 ; Bean v. Bean's Adm'r, 37 Ala. 17 ; Story’s Eq. Pl., Sec. 272.

Decree affirmed, and appellant must pay the costs of this court.

Bybd, J., not sitting.

Case Details

Case Name: Waller v. Taylor
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jan 15, 1868
Citation: 42 Ala. 297
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.