History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wallace v. Miller
52 Cal. 655
Cal.
1878
Check Treatment

cited Gibbs v. Swift, 12 Cush. 393; Lawrence v. Bullon, 37 Cal. 518; Corbin v. Liv*656ingston, 14 Wend. 619 ; Schenk v. Evoy, 24 Cal. 110; Gales v. Salmon, 35 Cal. 576; Kimball v. Semple, 25 Cal. 452; Ellis v. Icans, 26 Cal. 272.

Francis E. Spencer, for Respondent.

By the Court :

It is оrdеrеd thаt " thе judgmеnt herеin be аnd thе same is hеreby modified by thе striking therefrom, wherever thеy оссur, thе words “ onе twenty-eighth раrt,” and inserting in lieu thеreof thе words “ sevеn ‍‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​​‌‌​‍hundrеd and fifty twenty-one thousand three hundred and seventy-sevenths,” and in other respects the judgment and order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial, are affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.

Case Details

Case Name: Wallace v. Miller
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1878
Citation: 52 Cal. 655
Docket Number: No. 5732
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.