Wall v. State
615 So. 2d 822 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1993
The State concedes that Appellant s right to confront witnesses was violated by the introduction of a deposition to perpetuate testimony at which Appellant was not present. Brown v. State, 471 So.2d 6 (Fla.1985). Its use constitutes fundamental error. Regarding the other issue raised, we find no error in the denial of Appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal.
We reverse and remand for a new trial.
