History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wall v. Drasheff
249 Ala. 441
Ala.
1947
Check Treatment

Appeal from interlocutory order sustaining demurrer to amended bill seeking to declare a deed a mortgage.

To convert a conveyance absolute in its terms into a mortgage, the intention and understanding of all parties to that effect must concur. The fact that the grantor intended the conveyance as a mortgage is not sufficient. The grantee must also have so intended and considered it and accepted the instrument as such. Martin v. Martin, 123 Ala. 191, 26 So. 525; West v. Hendrix, 28 Ala. 226; Sewell v. Price's Adm'r, 32 Ala. 97; Mitchell v. Wellman, 80 Ala. 16; Mobile Building Loan Ass'n v. Robertson, 65 Ala. 382; Douglass v. Moody, 80 Ala. 61.

To invoke the aid of equity to this end "there must be specific allegation that security for the debt was understood and intended by both parties to the transaction." Hogan v. Moore, 221 Ala. 355, 358, 128 So. 790, 792; Smith v. Smith,153 Ala. 504, 45 So. 168.

The bill as amended was notably deficient in these allegational requisites and the trial court must be affirmed in sustaining the demurrer thereto.

Affirmed.

GARDNER, C. J., and BROWN and LIVINGSTON, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Wall v. Drasheff
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jul 31, 1947
Citation: 249 Ala. 441
Docket Number: 6 Div. 574.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.