midpage

Walker v. StateWalker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Jul 23, 1985
No. 83-2375
Versions:474 So. 2d 319
10 Fla. L. Weekly 1789
1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14429
FERGUSON, Judge.

We reversed in part and remanded this case for an evidentiary hearing on petitioner’s motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Walker v. State, 432 So.2d 727 (Fla.3d DCA 1983). In this appeal from the denial of his 3.850 motion, petitioner challenges the imposition of four consecutive mandatory minimum sentences arising out of a single criminal episode.

*320Having considered the record we hold in accordance with now settled law that the “stacking” of four mandatory minimum three-year sentences is precluded where two or more firearm-related offenses are committed at the same time and place. Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983). A sentence which exceeds that provided for by law constitutes fundamental error which may be corrected by an appellate court even if no objection was entered in the trial court. See Noble v. State, 353 So.2d 819, 820 n.4 (Fla.1977); Whitehead v. State, 446 So.2d 194 (Fla.4th DCA 1984), rev. denied, 462 So.2d 1108 (Fla.1985); Gonzalez v. State, 392 So.2d 334 (Fla.3d DCA 1981).

Reversed and remanded with instructions to correct the three-year mandatory sentences so that they are concurrent.

Case Details

Case Name: Walker v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 23, 1985
Citations: 474 So. 2d 319; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1789; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14429; No. 83-2375
Docket Number: No. 83-2375
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In