History
  • No items yet
midpage
Walker v. State
32 Ga. App. 18
Ga. Ct. App.
1924
Check Treatment
Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of manufacturing whisky. The evidence failed to establish that any whisky had been made at the distillery in question, or that the beer found there by the arresting officers was intoxicating. The verdict, therefore, was unauthorized, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial was error. If the conviction had been for an attempt to manufacture whisky, another question would have-been presented.

Judgment reversed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Walker v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 15, 1924
Citation: 32 Ga. App. 18
Docket Number: 15260
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.