History
  • No items yet
midpage
105 So. 3d 550
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2012
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying Walker’s rule 3.800(a) motion without prejudice to Walker filing a rule 3.800(a) motion that affirmatively demonstrates on the face of the record his entitlement to additional credit. See Woody v. State, 993 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Walker v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 16, 2012
Citations: 105 So. 3d 550; 2012 WL 5620784; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19840; No. 5D12-2748
Docket Number: No. 5D12-2748
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In