65 Iowa 563 | Iowa | 1885
I. The plaintiff claims title to the land under a tax sale and a treasurer’s deed made thereon. The defendant in its answer claims ownership of the land, and alleges
Y. It becomes unnecessary, in view of the conclusion we reach that plaintiff was not required by the law to give notice of the expiration of the time of redemption, to consider the questions discussed by counsel for defendant involving the sufficiency of the notice and the appointment of an agent of defendant, as contemplated by Code, § 894. No questions other than these, and those we have passed upon, are discussed by defendant. Others are discussed by plaintiff, but their consideration is not demanded, under the view we take in the case.
Affirmed.